Hilston Park Precedent.
“If you can dream it, you can achieve it.” The Hilston Park case is the worked courtroom application of the Trust's instruments — Minister Mervyn's legal entity, the Assignment of Consent and the General Civil Restraining Order used to rebut claims, challenge the legitimacy of the administrative courts, and assert jurisdiction under universal law.
Key points
- Minister Mervyn — a legal entity used in court to stand for the living being
- Assignment of Consent (AOC) + General Civil Restraining Order (GCRO) to rebut claims
- May case at Hilston Park: civil code and commercial code denounced as pseudo-law
- Restoration of rights at Hilston Park led to the arrest of officers acting without jurisdiction
- Burden of proof on the existence of coronavirus is contested — challenged via Socratic technique
- Standing asserted as the secured-party creditor of the court (Justin Stein's order on coronavirus cited)
How this helps
- Challenge the right to use the legal fiction of Minister Mervyn in court
- Rebut claims using AOC + GCRO and presenting Justin Stein's order
- Use the Socratic method to expose contempt of court and the consequences of non-compliance
- Address copyright/IP infringement; refuse to stand surety; assert sovereignty and rebuttal
- Step out of administrative jurisdiction by surrendering the legal fiction
- Operate as Minister of one's own energy and matter in motion
Denouncement of civil & commercial code as pseudo-law
At Hilston Park the civil code and commercial code were denounced in open court as pseudo-law. The restoration of rights that followed allowed the arrest of police officers and the assertion of jurisdiction under universal law — the same jurisdiction recognised by the Justice Wynn Williams Judgement.
The burden of proof for the existence of coronavirus was placed back on the claimant. Officers and court officials were engaged using the Socratic technique — questions, not arguments — to highlight that contempt of court orders undermines their validity, and non-compliance weakens the authority of every subsequent order built on top of them.
Being honest with ourselves about outstanding tasks and responsibilities — discussing the steps of managing property and legal matters, and acting in accordance with lawful procedure — is the ground every Hilston-style remedy stands on. Sovereignty without responsibility is theatre.