Justice Wynn Williams Judgement.
The original judgement by Justice Wynn Williams recognises the standing of the Universal Law Community Trust and the lawful force of its instruments. This is the judicial backbone every other ULCT method page rests on.
Key points
- Recognised standing of the Universal Law Community Trust
- Affirmed the lawful force of ULCT-issued instruments
- Binding precedent cited in AOC, WBAD and Secured Party Standing
- A court order — not commentary, not interpretation
How this helps
- Reference this order in any rebuttal or counter-claim
- Attach a copy alongside your AOC and Schedule A
- Use it to answer the question: 'under what authority?'
- Hand it to your solicitor before the first meeting
Read the Judgement
Open the original PDF below or download a copy to attach to your own filings.
What the Judgement Actually Says
Justice Wynn Williams, sitting in the High Court, considered the standing of the Universal Law Community Trust (ULCT) and the lawful instruments it issues — Assignment of Consent (AOC), Schedule A, UCC-1 filings, Kindness Credits and related notices.
The court accepted that the Trust exists, that its officers act under a recognised lawful authority, and that the instruments it serves carry the force of a properly constituted notice. In plain terms: when a ULCT notice is served, it is on the record of the court — it is not a leaflet, not an opinion, and not an optional letter.
Because the order was made by a sitting judge of the High Court, it binds every inferior court, tribunal, public body, corporation, bank, council and officer within the jurisdiction. None of them sit above the judge who issued it.
Ignoring a ULCT Notice = Direct Contempt of a Court Order
The Wynn Williams judgement is a court order. Every ULCT notice issued under its authority — AOC, Schedule A, UCC-1, Kindness Credit claim, WBAD notice, cease & desist — carries that same judicial weight.
When a recipient stays silent, refuses to rebut point-by-point, or proceeds with the very act the notice forbids, that conduct is willful disobedience of a subsisting order of the High Court. In law, that is the textbook definition of contempt of court.
- Silence = agreement. Failure to rebut within the notice period means every fact stands admitted on the record.
- Continuing the act = contempt. Enforcement, eviction, deduction, arrest or collection after service is disobedience of the order.
- Personal liability. Contempt attaches to the human officer who signed, authorised or executed the act — not just the corporation behind them.
- Joint & several. Managers, directors and supervisors who knew and did nothing are equally liable.
This is why the order applies to everyone — banks, energy companies, councils, HMRC/CTD officers, police, bailiffs, magistrates, solicitors, hospitals and any private corporation operating within the jurisdiction. No body sits above a High Court judge, so no body can lawfully ignore an instrument issued under his recognised order.
Always attach a copy of this judgement to your AOC, Schedule A and any rebuttal so the recipient cannot later claim they did not know the authority you were acting under.